Browse DORAS
Browse Theses
Latest Additions
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed for use under a:

Developing consensus on what constitutes 'success' following upper limb loss rehabilitation

NÍ Mhurchadha, Sineád Eilís (2010) Developing consensus on what constitutes 'success' following upper limb loss rehabilitation. PhD thesis, Dublin City University.

Full text available as:

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader


The aim of this research is to explore what constitutes success following upper limb absence (ULA), and to reach consensus on which areas are important to consider in the rehabilitation of an individual following ULA. Following a review of the literature on ULA, two case studies using the repertory grid technique (RGT) was undertaken with two prosthesis users in order to understand the unique requirements that upper limb prosthetic users may have. Following this, eleven interviews were conducted with Rehabilitation Professionals (RP’s). Two focus groups were also conducted with a total of seven individuals with ULA and one to one interviews with four additional individuals were used to supplement these focus groups. These qualitative studies were conducted in order to determine prominent factors of importance following ULA from both perspectives. All data were analysed using thematic analysis. This study culminated in a Delphi study in order to reach consensus regarding what is considered successful outcomes in three key areas: ‘Prosthesis use’, Activities and Participation’ and ‘Self image’ where there is currently little knowledge or agreement in the literature. The Delphi also aimed to identify the salient factors that are important for RP’s to take into consideration following ULA. The RGT produced a unique profile of preferences regarding prosthetic technologies for each participant. The qualitative analyses with RP’s and individuals with ULA produced common themes such as ‘Prosthesis Use’, Activities and Participation’, ‘Psychological factors’, ‘Physical factors’, ‘Social factors’, ‘Satisfaction with the prosthesis’ and ‘Satisfaction with the service’. However, the emphasis within these themes differed amongst RP’s and individuals with ULA. Consensus was reached in several areas following the Delphi study, which revealed core factors and items to consider. This study identified what RP’s and individuals with ULA believe constitutes success in three key areas and identified the most important factors that RP’s should consider in the rehabilitation setting. These factors will provide a guide for RP’s in assessing the progress of individuals with ULA and identifying the important areas to target in rehabilitation.

Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Date of Award:March 2010
Supervisor(s):Gallagher, Pamela
Subjects:Medical Sciences > Psychology
Medical Sciences > Health
DCU Faculties and Centres:DCU Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Science and Health > School of Nursing and Human Sciences
Use License:This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. View License
Funders:Health Research Board
ID Code:15330
Deposited On:05 Apr 2011 10:55 by Pamela Gallagher. Last Modified 01 Mar 2017 15:18

Download statistics

Archive Staff Only: edit this record