Why electoral systems don’t always matter: The impact of “Mega-seats” on legislative behavior
Martin, Shane (2011) Why electoral systems don’t always matter: The impact of “Mega-seats” on legislative behavior. (Paper No. 2011 No 6). Dublin City University.
Full text available as:
A significant and influential body of research suggests that electoral systems influence legislators’ behavior. Yet, empirical research frequently fails to uncover the existence of such a relationship. This study offers a potential solution: The core suggestion is that the mechanisms by which prized post-election positions (mega-seats) are distributed within a legislature impacts legislative behavior. When party leaders cartelize the allocation of mega-seats, the anticipated effects of the electoral system on legislators’ behavior may dissolve. Ireland’s candidate-centered electoral system and party-controlled mega-seat allocation provides for a hard empirical test of the argument. New data on mega-seats and voting behavior in the Irish parliament between 1980 and 2010 supports the notion that mega-seat considerations rather than the electoral system shapes roll-call behavior. The implication is that what goes on within the legislature may be more important for influencing legislators’ behavior than what goes on at the ballot box. This observation may resolve the puzzle of why electoral systems do not always exert their purported influence.
|Item Type:||Working Paper (No. 2011 No 6)|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||post-election positions; mega-seats; legislative behaviour|
|Subjects:||Social Sciences > Political science|
|DCU Faculties and Centres:||UNSPECIFIED|
|Publisher:||Dublin City University|
|Use License:||This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. View License|
|Deposited On:||24 May 2011 11:39 by Shane Martin. Last Modified 24 May 2011 11:39|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record