Multimedia traffic and real-time e-commerce applications can experience quality degradation in traditional networks such as the Internet. These difficulties can be overcome in networks which feature dynamically set up paths with bandwidth and delay guarantees. The problem of selecting such constrained paths is the task of quality of service (QoS) routing. This paper considers link-state routing, and the choice of cost metric used to implement QoS routing. There are two schools of thought regarding the choice of link cost. It is commonly assumed that QoS routing algorithms should limit hop count so as to conserve resources for future connections. Others advocate load balancing mechanisms so as to increase overall network utilisation. This paper investigates which of these approaches gives the better performance. We show that there is no one general answer to this question. We also point out the dangers of drawing general conclusions about routing algorithm performance based on the study of only a limited set of network topologies.