Login (DCU Staff Only)
Login (DCU Staff Only)

DORAS | DCU Research Repository

Explore open access research and scholarly works from DCU

Advanced Search

Companies in Court and the Limits of their Legal Personality: An Argument Against the Strict Application of the Rule in Battle

Quinn, John (2022) Companies in Court and the Limits of their Legal Personality: An Argument Against the Strict Application of the Rule in Battle. The Irish Jurist, 67 . p. 55. ISSN 0021-1273

Abstract
In 1968 the Supreme Court in Battle v Irish Art Promotion Centre Ltd ruled that representation of a company in court was limited to legal counsel instructed to act on its behalf, a judgment recently upheld by the Supreme Court in AIB plc v Aqua Fresh Fish Ltd. The consequence is that a company’s agent cannot represent it in court. The reasons underpinning the rule in Battle are that it is a logical consequence of the company’s separate legal personality and that it facilitates the efficient administration of justice. However, corporate legal personality is not and should not be a concept rigidly applied in disregard of the surrounding context. While the rule in Battle does serve the administration of justice it can, in certain contexts, produce unjust consequences on companies in financial difficulty, unjustifiably impacting their rights to fair procedures and a fair trial.
Metadata
Item Type:Article (Published)
Refereed:Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords:Law
Subjects:Social Sciences > Law
DCU Faculties and Centres:UNSPECIFIED
Publisher:Thomson Round Hall
Copyright Information:© 2022 The Irish Jurist
ID Code:29801
Deposited On:05 Apr 2024 13:08 by John Quinn . Last Modified 05 Apr 2024 13:08
Documents

Full text available as:

[thumbnail of The Rule in Battle 2024 (1).pdf]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
559kB
Downloads

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Archive Staff Only: edit this record