Browse DORAS
Browse Theses
Search
Latest Additions
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed for use under a:

Do deputy-leaders matter?: a comparative study

Fitzgerald, Peter (2006) Do deputy-leaders matter?: a comparative study. PhD thesis, Dublin City University.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
7Mb

Abstract

Little has been written on deputy-leaders and the received wisdom, such as it is, is that deputy-leaders have little power and hence do not matter. A global survey of deputyleaders found that 68 per cent of states had a deputy-leader. So, however powerful they may be, they are certainly a fairly common political phenomenon. To test whether or not deputy-leaders are politically powerful and thus matter, seven hypotheses were identified with nine observable implications. A comparative approach was adopted, examining the careers of 64 deputy-leaders in five states. The overall results of the tests were somewhat at odds with the perceived wisdom that deputy-leaders do not matter. Furthermore, the outcomes of the tests at the level of the individual states in this study found strong proof that deputy-leaders in the US can influence policy outcomes and there was some proof that British and Swedish deputy-leaders could do so as well.

Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Date of Award:2006
Refereed:No
Supervisor(s):Elgie, Robert
Uncontrolled Keywords:policy; influence; deputy leaders
Subjects:Social Sciences > Political science
DCU Faculties and Centres:DCU Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Science > School of Law and Government
Use License:This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. View License
ID Code:17386
Deposited On:03 Sep 2012 16:35 by Fran Callaghan. Last Modified 03 Sep 2012 16:35

Download statistics

Archive Staff Only: edit this record