Fitzgerald, Peter (2006) Do deputy-leaders matter?: a comparative study. PhD thesis, Dublin City University.
Abstract
Little has been written on deputy-leaders and the received wisdom, such as it is, is that deputy-leaders have little power and hence do not matter. A global survey of deputyleaders found that 68 per cent of states had a deputy-leader. So, however powerful they may be, they are certainly a fairly common political phenomenon. To test whether or not deputy-leaders are politically powerful and thus matter, seven hypotheses were identified with nine observable implications. A comparative approach was adopted, examining the careers of 64 deputy-leaders in five states. The overall results of the tests were somewhat at odds with the perceived wisdom that deputy-leaders do not matter. Furthermore, the outcomes of the tests at the level of the individual states in this study found strong proof that deputy-leaders in the US can influence policy outcomes and there was some proof that British and Swedish deputy-leaders could do so as well.
Metadata
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) |
---|---|
Date of Award: | 2006 |
Refereed: | No |
Supervisor(s): | Elgie, Robert |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | policy; influence; deputy leaders |
Subjects: | Social Sciences > Political science |
DCU Faculties and Centres: | DCU Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Science > School of Law and Government |
Use License: | This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. View License |
ID Code: | 17386 |
Deposited On: | 03 Sep 2012 15:35 by Fran Callaghan . Last Modified 19 Jul 2018 14:57 |
Documents
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
7MB |
Downloads
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Archive Staff Only: edit this record