Browse DORAS
Browse Theses
Search
Latest Additions
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed for use under a:

Re-thinking assesment philosophy and practice peer- and self-assesment

Harrison, Catherine (2011) Re-thinking assesment philosophy and practice peer- and self-assesment. PhD thesis, Dublin City University.

Full text available as:

[img]PDF (PhD Thesis for Katherine Harrison 51166046 Vol 1) - Archive staff only. This file is embargoed until 01 January 2016 - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
1918Kb
[img]PDF (PhD Thesis for Katherine Harrison 51166046 Vol 2) - Archive staff only. This file is embargoed until 01 January 2016 - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
707Kb

Abstract

Many succeed academically through traditional assessment, but all students are disadvantaged by the one-size-fits-all, mechanistic approach which gives little consideration to the relational side of learning. This demands correction through a holistic philosophy of learning, where the learning environment caters for personal and social as well as academic development. More insidiously, traditional summative assessment obstructs the development of self- reliance, inculcating an over-reliance on ‘authority’ (teachers, examiners). New skillsets are needed by the 21st century, self-directed, lifelong learner. Teacher-directed assessment must defer to collaborative, interdependent, empowering, partnership based assessment, to maximise knowledge, work and life outcomes, benefiting individual and society. This study was conducted with a random selection of classes, including primary and secondary schools, early school leavers, senior learners and tertiary students. It shows that, when applied with care, peer- and self-assessment can serve as a summative and formative assessment tool, bringing additional benefits including self-reliance, critical thinking, decision-making, reasoned judgement and improved inter- and intrapersonal relationships. Identified as life-enabling competences, these are areas difficult to teach and not yet assessed, but critical to today’s society. This thesis calls for a paradigm shift in assessment thinking to bring about more innovative, holistic forms of assessment practice, which can support the learner’s sense of self and provide for sustainable lifelong learning. Peer- and self-assessment is shown to satisfy these criteria.

Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Date of Award:November 2011
Refereed:No
Supervisor(s):O'Hara, Joe
Uncontrolled Keywords:Peer Assessment; Curriculum; Education
Subjects:Social Sciences > Education
DCU Faculties and Centres:DCU Faculties and Schools > Faculty of Humanities and Social Science > School of Education Studies
Use License:This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. View License
ID Code:16622
Deposited On:29 Nov 2011 12:27 by Joe O'Hara. Last Modified 23 May 2012 11:20

Archive Staff Only: edit this record