Login (DCU Staff Only)
Login (DCU Staff Only)

DORAS | DCU Research Repository

Explore open access research and scholarly works from DCU

Advanced Search

Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners

Perea, Eva and Brady, Malcolm orcid logoORCID: 0000-0002-4276-3976 (2017) Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners. Journal of Management Development, 36 (8). pp. 1052-1062. ISSN 0262-1711

Abstract
• Purpose: This paper examines the engagement of business practitioners with academic business research. The main purpose is to assess whether there is a gap between academic research and business people, and, if so, how to bridge this gap. • Design/methodology/approach: Over 150 senior business practitioners were surveyed, in order to capture their views on the usefulness of academic research to them in their roles as practicing managers. Survey questions covered both their current access and reading of business related publications and what the ideal academic business journal should be, in terms of access and contents. • Findings: Academic journals are not very well known among business professionals. If these professionals could choose, they would like academic journals to be written by experienced business people, to contain business cases and to be accessible on line. Existing academic business journal ‘repositories’, such as Google Scholar, are not mentioned in the survey results. • Practical implications: The findings indicate that potential solutions to bridge the gap between academic journals and business practitioners should not be overly complicated to implement, and would greatly help bring these two communities closer, with mutually enriching results. • Originality/value: This article takes a very pragmatic view of the gap between academic journals and business practitioners, and seeks to assess this gap in terms of how it can be bridged on an everyday basis, rather than take a theoretical approach. It begs for the definition of actionable next steps.
Metadata
Item Type:Article (Published)
Refereed:Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords:Academic; Research; Rigor; Relevance; Business; Practitioner; Research-practice gap
Subjects:Social Sciences > Education
Business > Management
DCU Faculties and Centres:DCU Faculties and Schools > DCU Business School
Publisher:Emerald
Official URL:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0332
Copyright Information:© 2017 Emerald. This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0332 Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited. - See more at: http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/writing/author_rights.htm#sthash.CY1QqNe3.dpuf
Use License:This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. View License
ID Code:22136
Deposited On:14 Dec 2017 15:18 by Malcolm Brady . Last Modified 25 Nov 2020 13:40
Documents

Full text available as:

[thumbnail of 16papr05f.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
638kB
Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Downloads

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Archive Staff Only: edit this record