Kennedy, Eithne ORCID: 0000-0002-8443-0686 (2008) Improving literacy achievement in a disadvantaged primary school : empowering classroom teachers through professional development. PhD thesis, Dublin City University.
Abstract
The magnitude of the achievement gap between children in disadvantaged schools and their
more advantaged peers has been well documented (Hivers et al, 2004; LANDS, DES, 2005; Weir
et al, 2003). Government response has primarily been in investment in schools in terms of extra
staffing, resources, smaller class sizes and early intervention programmes. Until very recently,
there has not been a focus on supporting the quality of literacy instruction in the regular
classroom. This study set out to investigate: (a) how a research-based best practice balanced
literacy framework could be designed for and implemented in the Irish context in collaboration
with a Band 1 DEIS school (the Irish Department of Education’s current scheme for schools in
areas of high socio-economic, disadvantage); (b) the particular conditions, resources and kinds of
professional development required to support teachers in implementing such a framework and
how teachers would respond to the change process; (c) the impact of the changes on children’s
motivation and engagement with literacy, their knowledge of literacy strategies, and their
achievement on standardised tests of literacy; and (d) parents’ perspectives on their children’s
motivation and engagement in literacy following the changes in instruction. The study was
informed by the literature on effective schools and teachers in high-poverty areas that were
successful in raising achievement in literacy, the literature on professional development and the
literature on current understandings of essential pedagogical content and strategies in literacy.
The partner school agreed to collaborate in the research over a two-year period. The classroom
teachers of four First classes, the children in these classes, the children’s parents, and four special
education teachers consented to participate. A mixed methods design was employed which
allowed for the exploration of multiple questions using the following research tools:
questionnaires; interviews with teachers, children and their parents; observations of teachers in
their classrooms; and a range of formative and summative assessment measures designed to track
changes in children’s literacy achievement.
Findings indicated that, by the end of the study, the children had significantly higher
achievement in reading, writing and spelling than would be expected based on their pre-test
scores. Teachers attributed these achievement gains to the changes they had made to their
classroom instruction. Teachers reported having higher expectations for the children and higher
levels of self-efficacy and confidence in their own ability to address literacy difficulties. No one
factor emerged as the agent of changé; rather, a synergy of factors at school and classroom levels
were identified as contributing to their success. These included the on-site, context-specific
professional development which enabled teachers to expand their expertise in terms of subject
knowledge and new approaches and methodologies; the provision of resources (mainly reading
materials) which contributed to the motivation and engagement of the children; regular
opportunities for professional debate, dialogue and reflection among teachers through planning
meetings; collaboration with teaching colleagues at the same class level and team-teaching with
the special education team. The adoption of a 90-minute block of uninterrupted time for literacy
signalled a school priority on literacy. It allowed for the provision of a cognitively challenging
curriculum as well as establishing a basis for greater engagement in literacy. Teachers and
parents reported that, following the programme, children were more motivated, engaged, and
strategic in their approach. They were choosing to read and write both inside and outside school
and this had had a positive influence on the family as a whole. Teachers felt that the parental
component was valuable and identified it as an area meriting further development. Thus, a focus
on high-quality instruction combined with support for teachers and parents can begin to help
children in disadvantaged areas to reach their potential on key aspects of literacy.
Metadata
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) |
---|---|
Date of Award: | November 2008 |
Refereed: | No |
Supervisor(s): | Shiel, Gerry and Marsh, Jackie |
Subjects: | Social Sciences > Education Social Sciences > Teaching |
DCU Faculties and Centres: | DCU Faculties and Schools > Institute of Education |
Use License: | This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. View License |
ID Code: | 22518 |
Deposited On: | 31 Jul 2018 14:24 by Thomas Murtagh . Last Modified 19 Oct 2022 10:46 |
Documents
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
12MB |
Downloads
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Archive Staff Only: edit this record