Lysaght, Zita ORCID: 0000-0002-0897-4710 (2009) From Balkanisation to boundary crossing: using a teacher learning community to explore the Impact of assessment on teaching and learning in a disadvantaged school. Doctor of Education thesis, Dublin City University.
Abstract
Irish education is currently witnessing a fundamental shift in focus from an emphasis
on curriculum revision, professional development and policy implementation to one of
review, with the concomitant effect that issues of evaluation and assessment are increasingly
high on the agenda. This is evidenced by the publication in recent years of a series of
evaluation reports which, in addition to identifying successes achieved, have highlighted a
number of related iterative weaknesses in the system that continue to thwart progress. One is
the apparent lack of assessment literacy which has been attributed mainly, but not exclusively,
to teachers. Another is the growing body of international evidence suggesting that
pedagogical practices in schools serving disadvantaged children are qualitatively different to
those found in more advantaged settings. Finally, there is the evidence that low levels of
literacy persist in Ireland, despite significant investment and innovation.
In responding to these challenges, this study examined the potential of a teacher
learning community (TLC) as a vehicle of professional development, to bring about changes
in teachers’ understanding and use of Assessment for Learning (AfL), in order to improve the
reading competency of a cohort of children attending a designated disadvantaged, junior
school, in the Republic of Ireland. Employing a partially mixed, concurrent, equal status,
quantitative/qualitative design, the study investigated three research hypotheses pertaining to
(1) children’s reading achievement, (2) their motivation to read/employment of AfL strategies
when reading and (3) teachers’ knowledge, skills and attitudes of/to AfL. Outcomes from the
quantitative data with respect to the first two hypotheses indicated that there were no
statistically significant differences in mean reading achievement between control and
experimental groups following the intervention, although significant differences were found
for reading strategies. The qualitative data relating to the third hypothesis revealed that
important changes had occurred in teachers’ attitudes and classroom practice over the
duration of the project. The study concludes by drawing attention to the potential of a TLC,
reconceived as a boundary zone, to challenge the traditional balkanisation of teachers’
working lives.
Metadata
Item Type: | Thesis (Doctor of Education) |
---|---|
Date of Award: | November 2009 |
Refereed: | No |
Supervisor(s): | O'Leary, Michael and Deegan, James |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | teacher assessment; educational disadvantage; professional development; Assessment for Learning; AfL |
Subjects: | Social Sciences > Education Social Sciences > Teaching |
DCU Faculties and Centres: | DCU Faculties and Schools > Institute of Education |
Use License: | This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. View License |
ID Code: | 22527 |
Deposited On: | 02 Aug 2018 13:57 by Thomas Murtagh . Last Modified 07 Feb 2023 13:58 |
Documents
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
7MB |
Downloads
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Archive Staff Only: edit this record